Rail Baltica `ga seems to be, at least in the context of Estonia, msc tracking finito ... Regardles

Rail Baltica `ga seems to be, at least in the context of Estonia, msc tracking finito ... Regardless of the kind of poliitpopulistlikest (a`la EU Transport Commissioner S. Shore) and South Africa-the human (Sulev Valner) needs resulting from wishful thinking and dreams. This is due in part to the historical necessity and partly because of our own politicians earlier position and suunavõttudest.
If the 90's (after the independence of the Baltic states) would have remained on the Narva River East-West border of the Iron Curtain with the movement of goods, services and people's movement msc tracking would correspond Rail Baltica from Berlin to Tallinn for work. The currently fixed rail would solve the problems of the Gulf of Finland. For Europe it would be so required.
If the 90's (or 2000's) of our politicians have chosen the path of integration in Russia increased transport systems (the last option was to participate in the project Nordstream` i) would follow the current Rail Baltica (St. Petersburg-Tallinn -Riia - Berlin), the robust construction. For the past two decades, Europe has a vital connection with Russia in historical context, and, of course, made it through those corridors that exist in the developed and where it is politically possible to do business most efficiently. Finnish msc tracking Rail comes out Baltica`le S. in St. Petersburg. As we know, this is a long-term section of the Rail Baltica `ie already in progress ...
So to-Rail Baltica will never be. Without us. Probably the route Helsinki-St.Petersburg-Novgorod and Riga -Berliin. But there's a story we've wanted to do more to identify themselves not only in the Baltic state in Northern Rural Women, particularly overseas provinces in Sweden ...
Rail Baltica is definitely not finito. 1) Siim Kallas has already msc tracking hinted that a new abmitsioonika Rail Baltica project feasibility study, the results are quite positive. Now explain to me that, as well as the most expensive and ambitious project feasibility studies are positive, then how is the project finito ?? 2) The political leadership has come from Tartu, and in any case, they are doing their utmost to bring the railways Tartu, Tartu, msc tracking and secondly to do in Tallinn.
Rail Baltica moving forward, I have no doubt. I raise the matter in a different light. Does any sane in a finito? Ireland (or other countries), based on the current analysis, published in 2007 by COWI. Its analysis of the key findings or recommendations msc tracking of the Rail Baltica start in small steps is implemented. Rail Baltica would be one oelmasoleva Tartu moving through the Russian-widths wide track width (1520 mm) railway stop the degradation of the final repairs, the final velocity is close to today. Only 120km / h. Rail Baltica 2 Increase speed rail would be the same until 160 km / h, still carry Tartu and Russian bars. These variants big problem is that they do not run a variant of the North-South msc tracking axis of anything. There is a passenger msc tracking or freight traffic. These variants justifying cheapness and Tartu greater number of residents. Cheap is only 120km / h, ie the current speed rail upgrades pragusel. If the goods are not attractive route, you must be over the carriage of passengers. Also, 160km / h is so large capital expenditure that it does not make sense for the trains to travel. This is because the passenger train every position msc tracking in the Baltic States is a deeply unprofitable activities. Spread them sleepers off as much as you like, but must subsidize large quantities anyway that would be unprofitable msc tracking passenger train. Thus, the greater the number of inhabitants will disappear argument. Tartu and Valmiera is not as large cities between them would be needed to build the railway. That is a fact!
Only 3 of the Rail Baltica, Rail Baltica msc tracking is a variant of the context of a viable solution, because msc tracking it brings out the potential of the Rail Baltica. Rail Baltica and Rail Baltica msc tracking 1, 2, do not open enough potential. Rail Baltica 3 is a variant which provides a new, European rail width (1435 mm) where the construction of passenger trains moving at least 200 km / h. Now it remains to choose the route corridor. COWI has recommended the construction of the railway lines in Pärnu. I can only agree with this opinion. Here it should be understood that even if the current rate of increase in the railway through Tartu, the "vast metropolis' to 160km / h passenger trains are not profitable, then why should a faster variant of the construction, which is orders of magnitude greater msc tracking than the cost of capital, to be profitable? Surely not. At least not in the carriage of passengers msc tracking in mind. For passenger transport is a variant of the kajumlik each and every variation msc tracking of speed. But Pärnu justification msc tracking must be suitable for the transport of goods to the position. Rail Baltica is going to work only if Finland gets its industrial potentials of trade. If you do not see the Finnish industry logisticians Rail Baltica msc tracking and economically sensible way for transit, then the Rail Baltica does not make sense to start building. msc tracking Capital msc tracking cost is just too high. Pärnu direction they see the business benefits. T