Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Where and how to listen

The Case of the accounts: how did it happen?
Shqip evropaelire.org عربی iraqhurr.org Հայերեն azatutyun.am accident radioerkenli.com Azərbaycanca azadliq.org Nohchiyn radiomarsho.com BiH / Hrv / Srb / CG slobodnaevropa.org Belarusian svaboda.org دری da.azadiradio.org ქართული radiotavisupleba.ge English RFE / RL Regional rferl.org Afghanistan gandhara.rferl.org Circassians khutynygharadio.com azattyq.org Kyrgyz Kazakh azattyk.org Makedonski makdenes.org پشتو افغانستان pa.azadiradio.org پاکستان mashaalradio.org فارسی radiofarda.com Româneşte europalibera.org Toҷikӣ ozodi. org Tatar azatliq.org Qırım ktat.krymr.com Turkmen azathabar.com Vzbekcha frt ozodlik.org Ukrainian Krim radiosvoboda.org ua.krymr.com Russian Russian svoboda.org rus.azattyq.org Kazakhstan Armenia Azerbaijan rus.azatutyun.am radioazadlyg.org ekhokavkaza.com Georgia Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan rus.azattyk.org rus.ozodi.org Crimea ru.krymr.com Eurasia www.currenttime.tv
Prague emphasis Expertise Freedom Online Conference Blitz analysis area of Freedom
Cheerless picture. 11-15 May 2015.
Where and how to listen
14-08-2011 10:41
Why do the authorities of Lithuania and Poland gave official Minsk information frt on bank accounts of representatives of the Belarusian civil society? As the Belarusian authorities to act? What are the consequences of the internal policy of Lithuania and Poland will have scandals with the transfer of the Belarusian side information on bank accounts of Belarusian dissidents? On these issues in the "Prague accent 'reasoned from Minsk Arche magazine editor Valery Bulgakov, from Warsaw - analyst Wojciech Borodzicz-Smolinski, from Vilnius - the political scientist Lauras Belinis. Drakakhrust: Why the competent authorities of Lithuania and, as it turned out, and Poland gave official Minsk information on bank accounts of representatives of the Belarusian civil society, in particular, the head of the human rights center "Viasna" Ales Bialiatski? Apparently, this information frt has become one of the grounds of arrest frt Bialiatski. It is possible that could be affected and other Belarusian human rights activists, public figures and politicians. What do you think is the reason? The hypocritical policy of Vilnius and Warsaw, spetsaperatsyya Belarus, and possibly some other special services, elementary bureaucratic irrelevance and disconnect works departments, something else. Lauras, what do you think? In Lithuania today value orientation is very vague Belinis: On the one hand the administration and bureaucrats really look at it is very formal. For them it does not matter what kind of person that his political destiny for them the main thing that paragraph was made. The bureaucratic approach to the problems of this kind always lead to tragic consequences. But on the other hand, all these bureaucratic frt actions must be under a certain control of the political power. Political power must set values and political orientation of the state. Every bureaucrat has to understand their political responsibility if it takes such decisions. In this case it was not. I do not know about other countries, but in Lithuania today value orientations are very vague. Drakakhrust: Wojciech when the scandal began in Lithuania, Belarus, some said that the reason for it - in the compromising policy of Vilnius, that Grybauskaite friends with Lukashenko and she supposedly ordered to do so. But if the same, as it turned out, was in Poland, where politics is quite different, then there was the same question - so what's the reason? This situation - an example of the gap between what the officials have to do, and should do policy-Borodzicz Smolinski: There are two aspects of the problem. Poland and Lithuania - is a democratic state in which all officials can not act like politicians, they must act solely in accordance with the law. If they have started their own interpretation of the law, our state have ceased to be democratic. Poland and Lithuania to work with Belarus on the basis of the agreement, which was adopted in the early 90s, when Belarus was still on a democratic path. This situation - an example of the gap between what the officials have to do, and should do politics. What happened - a huge mistake and the responsibility of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Poland, Ministry of Justice and the Prosecutor's frt Office. Politicians who are the heads of these institutions should have clear outline of how to interpret the law, not to give rise to such situations. The contract has a clause that allows you to refuse to hand over information if it would threaten the security and sovereignty of Poland. But these officials, apparently, first did not know that can take advantage of this clause, and secondly, do not know that the item had to be interpreted in the extended sense. And it is the direct responsibility of the political leadership. In our media have heard proposals to dismiss those prosecutors who passed this information. But this is wrong. They worked under the law, they did not violated. Responsibility must nests

No comments:

Post a Comment